Methods for journalists and scientists. Moving the course of interview into the direction that is right
Are you aware that optimal duration regarding the meeting, training demonstrates that 1 minute of oral message when decoding an meeting is corresponding to about 10 typewritten lines. Proceeding using this, it is important to gauge the right period of the conversation using the area allocated for this in a paper or magazine, essay or research paper. Then it makes no sense to talk for more than 25-30 minutes (taking into account the fact that oral translation is always reduced in volume due to clearer formulations, deletions of repetitions, etc.) if the volume of the text should be 100-150 lines (2-3 pages – the standard size of the interview),. During this time period, a journalist can usually ask three main questions (to the touch on three subjects) and 3-4 additional questions to every of those. The rule is that they should be set “in depth” rather than “in breadth”, that is, to specify the details of what has already been said, and not to ask about new facts of the same order for additional questions.
The motion when you look at the meeting may take destination in four instructions:
Moving ahead is just a gradual research of just one topic or perhaps a change from topic to topic. The movement is slow, in the second – fast in the first case. The speed that is optimal opted for for each situation, however the journalist should avoid extremes-as an exorbitant deepening when you look at the subject, when questions start to concern details which are uninteresting to a wide range of readers, and extortionate acceleration, if the journalist, after one question with this subject, moves about the next, then to yet the second and for that reason, none associated with the topics are more or less fully disclosed. Such a job interview can resemble the scene through the window of a high-speed train that is electric with regards to a specific landscape to begin with, since it immediately stops.
Movement to your part takes place when the main topic of conversation slips into an in depth discussion of any of their aspects. You also have to act from the circumstances, but in any case, usually do not lose control of time and keep it adequate stock to ask most of the primary questions on the topic or a few subjects associated with the meeting. Come back to the primary backbone associated with discussion occurs through the opening or filtering problems described above.
Movement backwards happens if the journalist needs clarification and description of exactly what had been said. Sometimes this will make sense, but strategically, the backward motion should be avoided, as time is squandered, while the growth of this issue will not take place.
Slipping in a single host to the meeting starts if the journalist calls into concern the statements associated with interlocutor and starts to argue with him. Starting a dispute is extremely dangerous. It constantly takes a complete lot of the time, and it may prove that the journalist just doesn’t have time to ask his questions and you will be kept with nothing. In an extreme case, it is possible to get into a dispute at the conclusion of the meeting, as soon as the responses into the primary questions have already been gotten.